1269/5/7/16 British Airways PLC v MasterCard Incorporated and Others – Summary of claim | 10 Oct 2016
![CLAIMANT BEATS ITS OWN PART 36 OFFER: DEFENDANT PAYS THE PRICE: OFFER BEATEN BY £4,800 LEADS TO DEFENDANT PAYING AN ADDITIONAL £65,000 – & INDEMNITY COSTS, & ADDITIONAL INTEREST… – Civil Litigation Brief CLAIMANT BEATS ITS OWN PART 36 OFFER: DEFENDANT PAYS THE PRICE: OFFER BEATEN BY £4,800 LEADS TO DEFENDANT PAYING AN ADDITIONAL £65,000 – & INDEMNITY COSTS, & ADDITIONAL INTEREST… – Civil Litigation Brief](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/bridge_transition_water_crossing.jpg?resize=1536%2C1024&ssl=1)
CLAIMANT BEATS ITS OWN PART 36 OFFER: DEFENDANT PAYS THE PRICE: OFFER BEATEN BY £4,800 LEADS TO DEFENDANT PAYING AN ADDITIONAL £65,000 – & INDEMNITY COSTS, & ADDITIONAL INTEREST… – Civil Litigation Brief
![Why are Bombardier suing Merseytravel over the contract for new trains? | A blog about Wirral Council, Wirral Council's councillors & officers Why are Bombardier suing Merseytravel over the contract for new trains? | A blog about Wirral Council, Wirral Council's councillors & officers](https://johnbrace.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Bombardier-Transportation-Limited-vs-Merseytravel-HT-2017-000009-Particulars-of-Claim-page-25-of-25-min.jpg)
Why are Bombardier suing Merseytravel over the contract for new trains? | A blog about Wirral Council, Wirral Council's councillors & officers
![AN INTERESTING ISSUE: CLAIMANT WHO FAILS TO PLEAD CONTRACTUAL INTEREST – DOESN'T GET INTEREST AT ALL – Civil Litigation Brief AN INTERESTING ISSUE: CLAIMANT WHO FAILS TO PLEAD CONTRACTUAL INTEREST – DOESN'T GET INTEREST AT ALL – Civil Litigation Brief](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/save_piggy_bank_money.jpg?ssl=1)
AN INTERESTING ISSUE: CLAIMANT WHO FAILS TO PLEAD CONTRACTUAL INTEREST – DOESN'T GET INTEREST AT ALL – Civil Litigation Brief
![No absolute bar to award of interest on foreign arbitral awards—SCA 1981, s 35A (Yukos v Rosneft (No. 3)) | LexisNexis Blogs No absolute bar to award of interest on foreign arbitral awards—SCA 1981, s 35A (Yukos v Rosneft (No. 3)) | LexisNexis Blogs](https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/blog/images/default-source/dispute-resolution/featured-images/sa-1019-028-925x286(1)dispute_resolution-3.tmb-carouselth.jpg?sfvrsn=fc4c60e6_2)
No absolute bar to award of interest on foreign arbitral awards—SCA 1981, s 35A (Yukos v Rosneft (No. 3)) | LexisNexis Blogs
![Lucinda Spearman successful in High Court appeal on the law applicable to interest under Rome II - 2 Temple Gardens Lucinda Spearman successful in High Court appeal on the law applicable to interest under Rome II - 2 Temple Gardens](https://www.2tg.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Lucinda-Spearman-480x480.png)
Lucinda Spearman successful in High Court appeal on the law applicable to interest under Rome II - 2 Temple Gardens
![Interest clauses – displacing the courts' wide discretionary powers to award interest on debt or damages | RPC Interest clauses – displacing the courts' wide discretionary powers to award interest on debt or damages | RPC](https://www.rpc.co.uk/-/media/rpc/images/people/armstrong_helen_web-336px-x-336px_2.jpg?iar=0&hash=191608B29428B62F46F8FF52EDDC7238)
Interest clauses – displacing the courts' wide discretionary powers to award interest on debt or damages | RPC
![Lucinda Spearman successful in High Court appeal on the law applicable to interest under Rome II - 2 Temple Gardens Lucinda Spearman successful in High Court appeal on the law applicable to interest under Rome II - 2 Temple Gardens](https://www.2tg.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Lucinda_Spearman_DSC_2935-scaled-1.jpg)
Lucinda Spearman successful in High Court appeal on the law applicable to interest under Rome II - 2 Temple Gardens
![WHEN THE DEFENDANTS FAILED TO BEAT THE CLAIMANTS' PART 36 OFFER, BUT MONEY IS NOT DUE IMMEDIATELY: WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES? – Civil Litigation Brief WHEN THE DEFENDANTS FAILED TO BEAT THE CLAIMANTS' PART 36 OFFER, BUT MONEY IS NOT DUE IMMEDIATELY: WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES? – Civil Litigation Brief](https://i0.wp.com/www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/old_scale_horizontal_weigh-1.jpg?ssl=1)
WHEN THE DEFENDANTS FAILED TO BEAT THE CLAIMANTS' PART 36 OFFER, BUT MONEY IS NOT DUE IMMEDIATELY: WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES? – Civil Litigation Brief
![SA8 Essential Reading - CIVIL-01-2324-RL(SA8) Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution Statements of - Studocu SA8 Essential Reading - CIVIL-01-2324-RL(SA8) Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution Statements of - Studocu](https://d20ohkaloyme4g.cloudfront.net/img/document_thumbnails/a3e2d8ff40c87e5cb301c6515730b3eb/thumb_1200_1697.png)
SA8 Essential Reading - CIVIL-01-2324-RL(SA8) Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution Statements of - Studocu
![SGS 3 Prepare - Statements of Case - Set out facts relied on, and all background facts to enable the - Studocu SGS 3 Prepare - Statements of Case - Set out facts relied on, and all background facts to enable the - Studocu](https://d3tvd1u91rr79.cloudfront.net/fb13eba7c5fdc6545da1e7f8449f1bd3/html/bg4.png?Policy=eyJTdGF0ZW1lbnQiOlt7IlJlc291cmNlIjoiaHR0cHM6XC9cL2QzdHZkMXU5MXJyNzkuY2xvdWRmcm9udC5uZXRcL2ZiMTNlYmE3YzVmZGM2NTQ1ZGExZTdmODQ0OWYxYmQzXC9odG1sXC8qIiwiQ29uZGl0aW9uIjp7IkRhdGVMZXNzVGhhbiI6eyJBV1M6RXBvY2hUaW1lIjoxNzEzMzc4MjQ4fX19XX0_&Signature=Etd2ylJcdyZucN-TB4YDhNoiGKRzXknGZu6F915~3Atca7khupsyAI-F-k6bFqm0KSqB~-RZh74lS8es3j2iwrEvFRr0C-Eh7XI66tbPrtBB5400NcCPriZrFCfO4sjAGU9xHU5mwIISkASIxWzCkM8wnyx-FR-I-Ew57JFJT4gJyY11q2o8QDyB~bOqVwN7gPn08xknmIowICzhdJxIgiN1OA0YsKgHhZVM8EVc00l08C2RA8GVMJxYICb6CSryQrW7yFDsmoe08pm~fIxz4676dvhC2fVwRn1MO7qNBcbyhMLs5h7qKAtt-MpGR7aaL8Fv4dZVf6aGBqNIZPAxKg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJ535ZH3ZAIIOADHQ)